World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Authors Evaluation

Qasim A, Zacharia GS, Veena F, Kandhi SD, Patel H. From esophagus to colon: A narrative review of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2026; 17(1): 115307 [PMID: 41884200 DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v17.i1.115307]

(20) (26) (0) (0) (0) (9) (1126)

Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors

The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.

1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?

Yes

2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?

Yes

3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?

Yes

4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?

Yes

5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?

Yes

6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?

Yes

7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?

Yes

8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?

Yes

9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?

Yes

10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?

Yes

11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?

Yes

12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?

Yes

Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors

The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.

1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?

Yes

2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?

Yes

3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?

Yes

4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?

Yes

Author‘s Comments

Overall, a great experience in publishing with a World group of journals. The overall process was relatively prompt, and the manuscript preparation is great. A further reduction in overall provessing time would further enhance the experience however I could be related to delayed respomse from reviewers, which is beyond the scope of the journal Thanks

Reply from the Editorial Office

Thanks for taking the time to share this feedback with us. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. We will improve the peer-review efficiency. We would love to work with you again!